AI Factory Assembly Line
Stop thinking of AI as a single tool, and start thinking of it as a specialized workforce.
The Problem with One-Size-Fits-All AI
Most people use AI like they're hiring a single expert to do everything. Need to analyze a document? Call GPT-4. Need to generate structured output? Call GPT-4. Need to process thousands of files? Call GPT-4 again.
This is like hiring a surgeon to sort your mail. Sure, they could do it, but it's expensive and wasteful.
The reality is that different AI models are good at different things. Some are fast and cheap but rough around the edges. Others are slow and expensive but incredibly precise. The key insight is learning when to use which.
The Assembly Line Approach
Here's how the two-stage strategy works:
Stage 1: The Scout - Use a fast, cheap model (like DeepSeek) to do the heavy lifting. Have it read through documents, identify patterns, extract key information, and create structured analysis. This model burns through tokens quickly and cheaply.
Stage 2: The Craftsman - Take the scout's structured output and feed it to a premium model (like GPT-4) with precise instructions to create the final product. The expensive model doesn't waste time reading raw documents - it focuses on what it does best: sophisticated reasoning and polished output.
A Real Example
Let's say you want to standardize metadata for thousands of documents. The naive approach:
- One-stage: Feed each 2,000-word document directly to GPT-4
- Cost: ~4,000 tokens × $0.03 = $0.12 per document
- For 1,000 documents: $120
The two-stage approach:
- Stage 1: DeepSeek analyzes each document, creates structured analysis (~200 words)
- Cost: ~4,000 tokens × $0.001 = $0.004 per document
- Stage 2: GPT-4 processes the analysis to create final output
- Cost: ~500 tokens × $0.03 = $0.015 per document
- Total per document: $0.019
- For 1,000 documents: $19
You just saved $101, and the quality is often better because the expensive model receives cleaner, more focused input.
Why This Works So Well
The magic happens because you're optimizing for each model's strengths:
Cheap models excel at:
- Pattern recognition in large text
- Basic classification and tagging
- Extracting structured data
- Summarizing key points
- Processing large volumes quickly
Expensive models excel at:
- Nuanced reasoning
- Complex formatting
- Creative generation
- Precise following of detailed instructions
- Handling edge cases gracefully
When you chain them together, you get the best of both worlds.
The Collaboration Effect
Here's something unexpected: the two-stage approach often produces better results than using the expensive model alone.
Why? Because the first stage acts as a filter and organizer. It highlights the important parts and structures the information in a way that makes the second stage more effective. It's like having a research assistant who reads everything and gives you a briefing before you make the important decisions.
The expensive model can focus entirely on the creative and analytical work instead of getting bogged down in parsing raw text.
Beyond Cost Savings
This strategy isn't just about saving money. It's about building better AI workflows:
Speed: The cheap model can process text much faster, so your overall pipeline runs quicker despite having two stages.
Scalability: You can parallelize the first stage across many cheap instances while using fewer expensive instances for the final processing.
Reliability: If the expensive model fails or is unavailable, you still have structured intermediate results you can work with.
Debugging: You can inspect the output of the first stage to understand what's happening in your pipeline.
The Broader Principle
This is part of a larger trend in AI: specialization. Just like human teams work better when people focus on their strengths, AI systems work better when different models handle different parts of the problem.
We're moving from the era of "one model to rule them all" to "the right model for the right job." The companies that figure this out first will have a massive advantage.
Getting Started
If you want to try this approach:
- Identify your bottlenecks: Where are you spending the most on AI tokens?
- Split the work: Can you separate the "reading and understanding" phase from the "creating and formatting" phase?
- Design the handoff: What structured format should the first model use to communicate with the second?
- Test and iterate: Start with a small batch and refine your prompts for both stages.
The two-stage strategy isn't just a cost optimization - it's a new way of thinking about AI workflows. Instead of trying to find the perfect model, focus on building the perfect team.
A mix of what’s on my mind, what I’m learning, and what I’m going through.
Co-created with AI. 🤖
Similar blog posts
More about me
My aim is to live a balanced and meaningful life, where all areas of my life are in harmony. By living this way, I can be the best version of myself and make a positive difference in the world. About me →