Replacing Scattered Scripts with Centralized Intelligence

Replacing Scattered Integration Scripts with a Centralized Intelligence Layer

At our company, we have dozens of different integrations that need to sync data between systems. Customer records need to flow from CRM to accounting. Inventory levels need to update from warehouses to e-commerce. Employee data needs to sync from HR to payroll. For the longest time, all of these integrations were managed by independent scripts.

We had syncCustomers.py that would run every hour, scan for modified CRM records, and push them to our accounting system. updateInventory.js would run every 5 minutes, pulling warehouse data and updating online stock levels. hrPayrollSync.ts would run nightly, mapping employee changes to payroll records. And so on.

Each of these integration scripts needed to be managed independently. Whenever a new system was added, a new integration script would be created. If one of the scripts started erroring, I'd need to figure out why, fix it, and then figure out how to replay the missed syncs. Sometimes we'd get reports from customers that certain data didn't sync properly. I'd painstakingly dig into logs & code, trying to figure out why a particular customer record didn't make it to QuickBooks on time. The first couple times this happened, I'd usually discover we lacked the logs to properly diagnose the issue. Once logs were in place, I'd uncover bugs caused by field mapping errors, API rate limits, or edge cases we hadn't considered.

Eventually, I came to my senses and realized that all of these various integration scripts were doing the same thing. And rather than have 30 different scripts each implementing their own half-baked version of data synchronization, we should have a robust, centralized system for understanding and connecting systems.

The Realization

The breakthrough came when I noticed a pattern. Every integration script had the same basic structure:

Connect to source system
Figure out what data changed
Transform the data to match destination format
Push to destination system
Handle errors and retries

But more importantly, they were all solving the same fundamental problem: teaching System A how to talk to System B.

The Unified Approach

Instead of writing code that moves data, we built a system that understands data. Here's the key insight: integration isn't about copying fields, it's about translating meaning.

We created a single table called SystemMappings with this structure:

model SystemMapping {
  id                String
  sourceSystem      String
  targetSystem      String
  entityType        String    -- 'customer', 'product', 'invoice', etc
  mappingRules      Json
  confidence        Float
  lastUpdated       DateTime
  status            MappingStatus
}

But here's where it gets interesting. Instead of manually coding each mapping, we built an analysis engine that:

Examines source system schemas
Examines target system schemas
Identifies semantic similarities
Generates mapping rules
Tests with real data
Learns from corrections

How It Works

When we connect a new system, our analyzer doesn't just look at field names. It looks at:

Data patterns: Is this field always an email? A phone number? A currency?
Relationships: Does this ID reference another table? Which one?
Business context: Is this a customer identifier or an internal reference?
Usage patterns: How does the application actually use this field?

For example, when analyzing a CRM, it might find:

A field called acct_num that always contains 10-digit numbers
This field is used as a foreign key in the opportunities table
It appears in API calls to the accounting system
Therefore: this is likely the customer account number

The Learning Loop

The magic happens when corrections are made. If our analyzer maps Company to BusinessName but a human corrects it to LegalName, the system learns:

In this industry, "Company" means legal entity name
Similar systems might have the same pattern
Future mappings should consider this context

After analyzing 50 insurance systems, our analyzer knows:

"Policy" and "Contract" usually mean the same thing
"Premium" might be monthly or annual (check the amount)
"Agent" and "Producer" are interchangeable
Custom fields starting with "x_" are usually client-specific

The Benefits

This centralized approach has transformed our integration practice:

From scattered scripts to unified intelligence: Instead of 30 scripts with 30 different error handling approaches, we have one robust system that handles all integrations.

From manual mapping to automated discovery: New integrations that used to take 40 hours of analysis now take 4. The system recognizes patterns it's seen before.

From brittle code to adaptive connections: When a system adds a new field or changes an API, our analyzer adapts. No code changes needed.

From reactive fixes to proactive monitoring: We can see all integration health in one place. Problems are caught before customers notice.

Implementation Details

The analyzer runs on a simple loop:

Discovery Phase: Every hour, scan all connected systems for schema changes
Analysis Phase: For any new fields/entities, run pattern recognition
Mapping Phase: Generate proposed mappings with confidence scores
Validation Phase: Test with sample data, flag any anomalies
Learning Phase: Incorporate feedback, update pattern library

For high-confidence mappings (>95%), changes are applied automatically. Lower confidence mappings are queued for human review.

The Philosophical Shift

We stopped thinking about integrations as code to write and started thinking about them as patterns to recognize. The question isn't "How do I map these fields?" but "What do these fields mean?"

This shift has profound implications:

New developers don't need to learn 30 different APIs—they learn one system
New integrations don't start from zero—they build on accumulated knowledge
Edge cases become teaching moments—not bugs to fix
Systems become self-documenting—the analyzer explains what it learned

Conclusion

Many of you have probably already centralized your integrations. But I haven't seen many people talk about centralizing the intelligence behind integrations.

The same way we moved from scattered cron jobs to a unified scheduler, we can move from scattered integration scripts to a unified understanding layer. The benefits compound over time—each new system makes the next one easier.

If you're currently maintaining a sea of integration scripts, each with their own quirks and bugs, consider this: what if instead of writing code that moves data, you built a system that understands data? The investment pays off surprisingly quickly.

A mix of what’s on my mind, what I’m learning, and what I’m going through.

Co-created with AI. 🤖

More about me

My aim is to live a balanced and meaningful life, where all areas of my life are in harmony. By living this way, I can be the best version of myself and make a positive difference in the world. About me →

Social

Contact

Resources