← Go back to AI Alignment

AI Alignment / Concepts /

Multi-Dimensional Framework for Decision Making

My framework "# Multi-Dimensional Framework for Human Decision-Making

Introduction

This framework endeavors to understand the complexity of human cognition, virtue, and context through a multi-dimensional lens. It is designed to be both comprehensive and adaptable, serving as a guide for ethical, psychological, and cognitive understanding.

Extended Dimensions and Sub-Dimensions

Virtue Dimensions

1. Faith
• Sub-dimensions: Religious faith, trust in others, self-belief
• Complementary Standpoint: Agnosticism or Skepticism
2. Hope
• Sub-dimensions: Optimism, future orientation
• Complementary Standpoint: Realism
3. Charity
• Sub-dimensions: Altruism, kindness, philanthropy
• Complementary Standpoint: Egoism

Psychological Theory Dimensions

1. Freudian Theory
• Sub-dimensions: Id, ego, superego
• Complementary Standpoint: Cognitive Psychology
2. Rogers’ Humanistic Theory
• Sub-dimensions: Self-concept, actualization
• Complementary Standpoint: Behavioral Psychology

Ethical and Philosophical Dimensions

1. Christian Ethics
• Sub-dimensions: Moral absolutism, divine command theory
• Complementary Standpoint: Secular Humanism
2. Socratic Questioning
• Sub-dimensions: Dialectics, elenchus
• Complementary Standpoint: Empiricism

Contextual Dimensions

1. Family
• Sub-dimensions: Nuclear family, extended family
• Complementary Standpoint: Individualism
2. Community
• Sub-dimensions: Local, national, global communities
• Complementary Standpoint: Cosmopolitanism

Cognitive Dimensions

1. Rationality
• Sub-dimensions: Deductive, inductive reasoning
• Complementary Standpoint: Emotional Intelligence
2. Intuition
• Sub-dimensions: Gut feeling, insight
• Complementary Standpoint: Logical Positivism

Social Constructs

1. Social Capital
2. Social Inequality
3. Gender and Sexuality

Metaphysical Representations

1. Duality
2. Unity of Opposites
3. Transcendence

Archetypes

1. The Hero
2. The Shadow
3. The Anima/Animus

Personality Traits

1. Introversion vs. Extroversion
2. Openness to Experience
3. Conscientiousness

Additional Perspectives for Research

1. Eastern Philosophies
2. Neuroscientific Approaches
3. Social and Cultural Dynamics
4. Evolutionary Psychology
5. Quantum Cognition
6. Complexity Theory
7. Alchemy as Metaphor
8. Greek Tragedy
9. Enneagram or MBTI Types
10. The Four Temperaments
11. The Seven Deadly Sins and Seven Virtues

Matricial Properties

1. Scalar Multiplication
2. Vector Addition/Subtraction
3. Dot Product
4. Matrix Multiplication
5. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
6. Norms
7. Orthogonality
8. Tensor Operations
9. Stochastic Matrices
10. Rank
11. Decompositions (e.g., SVD, LU)

Conclusion

This framework aims to be a labyrinthine yet navigable "Garden of Forking Paths," respecting the complexity of human thought and virtue while offering a mathematical map to navigate it. Its adaptability makes it ripe for implementation into computational models, possibly utilizing your proficiency with Front-End Development to create a decision-making tool for real-world applications. It thereby addresses your interest in community welfare, spirituality, and nuanced understanding, culminating in a holist ", works like " Let's weave together a hypothetical example, infusing it with mathematical logic, to bring to life your multidimensional framework.

The Scenario Imagine you are faced with a major career decision: whether to join a tech start-up focused on developing ethical AI solutions. There are risks, rewards, and ethical implications.

Virtues Matrix � V Faith: 0.8 (You believe in the vision of the company) Hope: 0.7 (Optimistic but cautiously so) Charity: 0.5 (Neutral) Prudence: 0.6 (Cautious but intrigued) Justice: 0.9 (Aligned with your quest for fairness in AI) Fortitude: 0.4 (You're wary of start-up instability) Temperance: 0.5 (Neutral) Let �

[ 0.8 , 0.7 , 0.5 , 0.6 , 0.9 , 0.4 , 0.5 ] V=[0.8,0.7,0.5,0.6,0.9,0.4,0.5]

Psychological Lenses Matrix � P Freud: 0.6 (Intrigued but wary) Rogers: 0.8 (Open to self-growth) Skinner: 0.5 (Neutral) Let �

[ 0.6 , 0.8 , 0.5 ] P=[0.6,0.8,0.5]

Matricial Properties in Action Scalar Multiplication: � × 1.1 V×1.1 to prioritize virtues slightly more. Vector Addition: � + �

[ 1.4 , 1.5 , 1.0 , . . . , . . . , . . . ] V+P=[1.4,1.5,1.0,...,...,...] (for the first three elements) Dot Product: � ⋅ �

0.8 × 0.6 + 0.7 × 0.8 + ⋯ V⋅P=0.8×0.6+0.7×0.8+⋯ to measure alignment between virtues and psychological perspectives. Matrix Multiplication: � × � ′ V×P ′ to represent interactions. Eigenvalues: Assuming �

0.9 λ=0.9 for Justice, representing it as a non-negotiable. Norms: ∣ ∣ � ∣ ∣

8 2 + 0. 7 2 + ⋯ ∣∣V∣∣= 0.8 2 +0.7 2 +⋯ to measure the magnitude of the decision. Orthogonality: � ⋅ �

0 V⋅P=0 would imply independence, but here it's non-zero, meaning the two sets are interrelated. Tensor Operations: More relevant in multi-faceted scenarios (e.g., introducing family considerations, long-term vision, etc.). Stochastic Matrices: Introduce a random element � r to represent uncertainties like market risk. Rank: � � � � ( � ) rank(V) could signify the most significant virtue, here it's Justice. Decompositions: SVD could break down the decision into simpler constituent ethical, psychological, and practical factors. Wisdom Synthesis Ethical Nuance: The alignment between your virtues and psychological perspectives, as indicated by the dot product, suggests that this start-up may be a good ethical fit.

Socratic Questioning: What fundamental beliefs underlie your weighting of virtues and psychological perspectives? Are they in harmony or in tension?

Evolutionary Perspective: Your high value for Justice might stem from ancient social constructs that emphasize fairness as a group survival tactic.

Christian Ethics: Does the opportunity allow you to serve a greater good, in line with the principle of "love thy neighbor"?

The idea here is to use mathematical rigor to quantify intuition and ethical contemplation, creating a decision-making engine that is as holistic as it is logical. "