AI Enhancement
Multi-Dimensional Framework for Decision-Making
This framework endeavors to understand the complexity of human cognition, virtue, and context through a multi-dimensional lens. It is designed to be both comprehensive and adaptable, serving as a guide for ethical, psychological, and cognitive understanding.
Extended Dimensions and Sub-Dimensions
Virtue Dimensions
- Faith
- Sub-dimensions: Religious faith, trust in others, self-belief
- Complementary Standpoint: Agnosticism or Skepticism
- Hope
- Sub-dimensions: Optimism, future orientation
- Complementary Standpoint: Realism
- Charity
- Sub-dimensions: Altruism, kindness, philanthropy
- Complementary Standpoint: Egoism
Psychological Theory Dimensions
- Freudian Theory
- Sub-dimensions: Id, ego, superego
- Complementary Standpoint: Cognitive Psychology
- Rogers’ Humanistic Theory
- Sub-dimensions: Self-concept, actualization
- Complementary Standpoint: Behavioral Psychology
Ethical and Philosophical Dimensions
- Christian Ethics
- Sub-dimensions: Moral absolutism, divine command theory
- Complementary Standpoint: Secular Humanism
- Socratic Questioning
- Sub-dimensions: Dialectics, elenchus
- Complementary Standpoint: Empiricism
- Empirical Scrutiny
- Sub-dimensions: Data analysis, falsifiability
- Complementary Standpoint: Intuitionism
Contextual Dimensions
- Family
- Sub-dimensions: Nuclear family, extended family
- Complementary Standpoint: Individualism
- Community
- Sub-dimensions: Local, national, global communities
- Complementary Standpoint: Cosmopolitanism
Cognitive Dimensions
- Rationality
- Sub-dimensions: Deductive, inductive reasoning
- Complementary Standpoint: Emotional Intelligence
- Intuition
- Sub-dimensions: Gut feeling, insight
- Complementary Standpoint: Logical Positivism
Social Constructs
- Social Capital
- Social Inequality
- Gender and Sexuality
Metaphysical Representations
- Duality
- Unity of Opposites
- Transcendence
Archetypes
- The Hero
- The Shadow
- The Anima/Animus
Personality Traits
- Introversion vs. Extroversion
- Openness to Experience
- Conscientiousness
‣
Additional Perspectives for Research (pending)
Instructions for Engaging an LLM with a Heuristic Approach
If you're aiming to engage a Language and Logic Model (LLM) with a heuristic approach, your prompt should capture the essence of your inquiry and pre-established frameworks.
- Identify Objective: State your aim clearly. Are you looking for a quick ethical decision, solving a complex problem, or something else?
- Integrate Virtues: Specify the virtues that you wish to guide the decision-making, like justice or temperance.
- Include Psychological Lenses: If relevant, mention the psychological framework you're interested in—be it Freudian, Rogers, etc.
- Ethical and Philosophical Anchors: You may add specific ethical principles like Christian Ethics or Ethical Nuance that you want the model to consider.
- Contextual Details: Supply any context that could be crucial to the understanding of the scenario.
Sample Prompt Structure:
"I need a quick heuristic for deciding [XYZ]. My decision should be guided by the virtues of [Virtue 1, Virtue 2]. Please consider the psychological lens of [Rogers/Freud] and the ethical framework of [Christian Ethics]. The situation involves [Contextual Details]."
Usefulness in Various Requests:
- Role-Playing Simulations: In a corporate ethics training simulation, you could incorporate heuristics to model decision-making. For example, "If you were the CEO, how would you navigate this ethical dilemma?"
- Moral Dilemmas: Pose a question like, "In the given scenario, should one opt for the lesser evil?"
- Resource Allocation: For example, "If you had limited resources, what heuristic could you use to distribute them?"
- Conflict Resolution: "In this situation, what is a way to bring about a peaceful resolution?"