← Go back
Cognitive Relativity
Think about the last time you were about to post something online. Maybe it was a thought you’d been turning over, or a photo you weren’t quite sure about, or a message you needed to send. Do you remember how that moment felt? There’s a particular quality to it. Time seems to stretch. Your attention sharpens. You can feel yourself running through possibilities. What will people think? How will they respond? Should I phrase it differently?
Now think about that same post a week later. It’s still there on your timeline, but something has changed. The moment that felt so charged and significant now feels flat. Distant. Almost like someone else wrote it. The emotional weight has evaporated. What happened?
Most of us assume this is just how memory works. Things fade. Emotions cool. We move on. But there’s something more interesting happening here, something that reveals how consciousness actually constructs our experience of time.
At any given moment, your mind is operating in what we can call a processing frame. This isn’t jargon for its own sake. It’s a useful way to name something specific. A frame is defined by three things working together. First, attention. How concentrated are your mental resources right now? Second, prediction. How many possible futures are you actively modeling? And third, agency. Do you feel like your actions will actually influence what happens next?
These three factors shape everything about how a moment feels. When all three are high, time dilates. Moments expand and fill with detail. When all three are low, time compresses. Moments shrink and feel thin. This isn’t metaphor. It’s a consistent relationship between what your brain is doing and what you experience.
Let’s go back to that moment before posting. Your mind is doing an enormous amount of work. You’re not just thinking one thought. You’re running multiple simulations at once. In one, someone responds positively and you feel validated. In another, someone misunderstands and you feel embarrassed. In another, no one responds at all and you feel invisible. Each of these possibilities gets tested against your emotions in real time. Your brain is processing all of this simultaneously, which creates incredible cognitive density.
That density is what makes time feel thick. The clock hasn’t slowed down. But your experience stretches because you’re doing so much mental work per second. Your attention is fully concentrated. You’re sampling your environment at high resolution. You notice subtle shifts in your own feelings. You catch details that might matter. Your predictive system keeps updating as new thoughts arrive. All of this generates the sense that the moment is rich, full, important.
And there’s something else. You believe your actions still matter. You can still choose not to send it. You can edit the words. You can wait. This sense of influence is not just a feeling. It’s a specific mode your brain enters when it detects that present choices will shape future outcomes. Your mind only deploys this expensive mode when there’s something worth deciding. That’s why the moment feels so alive. Your entire predictive machinery is online, weighing consequences, modeling outcomes.
Then you hit send.
Within minutes, sometimes seconds, everything changes. The moment that was just the center of your mental universe becomes something your brain treats as finished. Not because you’ve forgotten about it. Not because you stopped caring. But because your mind stops treating it as something that can be influenced. There are no more choices to make. No more outcomes to predict. The open future has collapsed into a single path.
When this happens, your cognitive system shifts into a completely different frame. It stops running those parallel simulations. It stops sampling at high resolution. It stops monitoring for subtle signals. None of that processing is useful anymore. The event is done. What your mind does instead is solve a storage problem. It keeps the basic meaning of what happened but discards most of the experiential texture. The result is a compressed representation. Information is preserved efficiently. Phenomenological detail is let go.
This is what efficient compression feels like from the inside. Your brain kept the gist and discarded the grain.
So when you look back at that post, what you’re experiencing is the same event processed through a completely different frame. When it was happening, your brain treated it as active, dynamic, worth modeling in rich detail. Now it treats it as archived, static, worth keeping only in simplified form. An event that felt extended and emotionally dense when it was unfolding now feels flat and distant in memory.
And here’s the crucial part. What changed was not the event itself. What changed was the frame.
This pattern appears everywhere once you start noticing it. Think about waiting for medical test results. Before they arrive, your mind runs threat models at high resolution. You’re modeling multiple health scenarios at once. Time feels stretched because your brain is doing so much predictive work. After the results land, good or bad, that same span of waiting feels thin in memory. The prediction engine has shut down. The moment gets archived as resolved.
Or think about standing backstage before you have to speak in public. Time dilates. You’re simulating audience reactions. You’re monitoring your own anxiety. Your attention is maxed out. But months later, when you recall that same talk, it compresses to a few key facts. The dense phenomenology that surrounded the experience is gone.
The mechanism is always the same. High attention, active prediction, and felt agency create one kind of experience. Their absence creates another. And the difference between these two states is not subtle. It’s the difference between time feeling thick and time feeling thin. Between moments that feel alive and moments that feel like abstractions.
We can be precise about this. Duration isn’t really about minutes and hours. It’s about cognitive work. When your mind runs complex predictions with focused attention and a sense that your actions matter, time dilates. The same span of clock time feels longer and more significant. When your mind operates in low key retrieval mode with minimal attention and no sense of influence, time compresses. The same span feels shorter, thinner, barely there.
The variation in how long something feels corresponds directly to how hard your brain is working within a given frame.
Now here’s where it gets strange. This means you can never fully re-experience a past moment. You can remember what happened. You can recall the facts. But you can’t regenerate the feeling. The feeling was produced by mental processes that aren’t running anymore.
The version of you that wrote something last month was operating in a different frame. That version had different things in active attention, different predictions running, different estimates of what mattered. You can’t step back into that frame. The processing state that created that experience no longer exists.
This leads to something worth stating clearly. Your sense of self is not as continuous as it feels.
You are a series of processing frames, each one coherent in its own moment but not perfectly connected to the others. The self who posted something while running high level predictions is genuinely different from the self who later recalls it while running minimal prediction. Not different people. But different frames of the same system.
That’s why you sometimes look at old posts and think, did I really write that? In a meaningful sense, you didn’t. A previous frame did, operating under different conditions with different priorities.
Try this. Try to remember feeling anxious about something from months ago. You know you were anxious. You can describe what the anxiety was about. But you can’t actually feel it again. The feeling itself is gone.
This is because the feeling wasn’t a stored object. It was a live process. It was the output of real time computation involving threat detection and uncertainty management. That computation stopped running. What you have now is a compressed summary that preserves the information but not the experience. The experience required the actual process. And the process is over.
This creates an odd effect where only the present feels fully real. Past events feel like sketches. Like abstractions. And this is accurate perception, not nostalgia or distortion. The past really did have full experiential depth when it was present. But that depth was generated by processes that have since shut down. What remains is genuinely less rich because it exists in compressed form. The texture is gone because texture is expensive to maintain. Your brain only generates it where active processing justifies the cost.
The future is different again. It’s not stored like the past. It’s simulated in real time. When you worry about how people might respond to something you’re planning to post, you’re not accessing memories. You’re running models right now. Generating hypothetical scenarios. Evaluating how they feel. This simulation happens in the present and produces real emotions in the present.
That’s why anticipatory anxiety feels so immediate despite being about something that hasn’t happened yet. The anxiety isn’t located in the imagined future. It’s happening now, as your mind runs through possibilities within your current frame.
What emerges from all this is a picture of consciousness as frame bound. At any given moment you occupy a specific processing frame with particular levels of attention, prediction, and agency. That frame determines how time feels. How events register. Which emotions appear. You never observe experience from outside a frame. Every moment is generated from within one. And that frame sets the geometry of what it feels like to be you right now.
The timeline we use to think about our lives is useful for practical purposes. But it doesn’t match how consciousness actually works. Experience doesn’t flow smoothly along that line. It jumps between frames that have different characteristics.
The present is where active prediction happens and attention runs at full resolution. The past is compressed storage where prediction has stopped. The future is simulated space where prediction points forward. These three modes feel completely different because they’re implemented by different mental operations. Trying to think of them as one continuous stream creates confusion because the operations themselves are discontinuous.
This is cognitive relativity. The principle that how time feels, how intense emotions are, and how rich experience is all depend on your current processing frame rather than any objective measure.
Just as Einstein showed that measurements of time depend on your reference frame in physics, cognitive relativity shows that experiential qualities depend on your processing frame in mind. Different frames produce different experiences of the same objective events. There’s no frame independent fact about how long a moment feels or how important it seems. Those qualities are generated by mental operations that change systematically depending on what frame you occupy.
And this reframes experiences we usually treat as mysterious or poetic.
Feeling disconnected from past decisions is not confusion or mere growth. It’s perception of frame discontinuity.
Cringing at old writing is not just evidence of maturity. It’s the gap between frames that ran on different parameters.
When you judge past choices harshly, you’re comparing outputs from incompatible frames and mistaking the mismatch for moral failure. Frame awareness softens that judgment. The earlier you was coherent in its own frame, just as you are in this one.
When nostalgia makes the past feel both vivid and unreachable, you’re detecting a real paradox. You have semantic access to events whose experiential texture cannot be regenerated.
These are not quirks. They are what frame dependent consciousness feels like from the inside.
The compression of past experience and the simulation of future possibility aren’t bugs. They’re necessary features of operating with limited resources in an uncertain world. You can’t keep every moment at full detail. The cost would be impossible. Instead, your mind keeps one high resolution frame where active prediction operates. Everything else gets compressed into efficient forms for storage. This is adaptive optimization, not limitation.
What you feel when you notice the strange asymmetry around posting is consciousness becoming visible to itself. You’re catching the transitions between processing frames. The moments when your mind shifts from active prediction to archived storage. From high resolution to compressed form.
These transitions usually happen automatically, below awareness. But sometimes you catch them mid shift. You notice that present and past don’t feel continuous because they aren’t continuous. They’re implemented by different operations with different signatures.
The sense that only the present is fully real isn’t illusion. It’s accurate perception of where your cognitive resources are actually concentrated and where experiential richness is actually being generated.
Everything else is trace. Compression. Archive. Real in its way, but not alive in the same sense. Not thick with possibility. Not dense with attention. Not here.